A "case" is tested by whether the elements of proof are likely
present to persuade a court that the employer's conduct permits you
to recover damages.
The elements of a "whistleblower case" are basically
- 1) that you
complain about or resist some conduct by the Company, or that the
employer anticipates that you will complain;
- 2) that your complaint
is communicated informally or formally, internally or externally to
the company, verbally or in writing, to someone in charge;
- 3) that
your complaint goes beyond some trivial issue to a matter of "well
established and important public policy", such as discrimination,
harassment, or a crime,
- 4) that the employer takes action against
you because of your complaint or resistance;
- 5) that you suffer
significant career injury as a result.
A "discrimination case" requires elements to be proven as well.
These are
- 1) that you are in a "protected category", such as over
40, or disabled, or on medical leave, or of a certain race,
national origin or ethnicity, or any other group identified for
protection by statute;
- 2) that you were qualified for the job and
doing your job satisfactorily;
- 3) that you were replaced in your
position (or somehow that someone was "preferred" or given greater
opportunity) who was outside the "protected category";
- 4) that that
preferred person was no more qualified and no better performer than
you;
- 5) that the official reason given by the employer for its
adverse action is so patently false and unsupportable by reason or
fact as to be considered a lie;
- 6) that you have been significantly
damaged by the adverse action. Note that this burden of proof does
not require that you have proof of a statement by the employer of
its intent to discriminate.
"Harassment" is proven by many of the same elements as a
discrimination case, but the focus is on how severe or pervasive
the employer's distressing conduct may be. If severe, such as a
physical assault, little or no repetition of the conduct is
required. If not severe, such as occasional unjustified critical
and demeaning comments, or offensive images, the numbers and
frequency of the events must be sufficient to create a "hostile
work environment", that is, be pervasive.
You must prove not only
that you personally found the environment distressing, but that a
"reasonable" man or woman in your position would feel that way as
well. The degree of distress must be such that it would unduly
burden the ability of even a resilient person to work in such an
environment. An emotional break-down is not required, nor is proof
of medical treatment.
Basic "unfairness" cases are sometimes proven if the Employer
followed a long standing policy of fairness that led employees to
reasonably expect that "fairness" would be followed in deciding
discipline, demotion, transfer or firing. The "policy" may be
written, but it may also be inferred from the employer's
established practices of fairness. Length of employment is a factor
in expecting this fairness, but even long employments will not by
themselves create an "implied contract" for fairness, honesty, and
good faith.
This "implied contract" is formed by several factors:
employer policies, such as progressive discipline or probationary
periods, that suggest "fairness"; promises and assurances of job
security by the employer; commendation or praise for good work
done; the industry practice for job security, and the length of
your employment. Sometimes these factors can overcome even a
written policy of "at will" employment.
Time Limits: Be aware that the law sets limits on how long you
have to file your claims. Failure to file may result in loss of the
right to maintain your claim in an Agency or Court. Federal
discrimination claims before the EEOC must be filed within 180 days
of the discriminatory act. Discrimination claims based on
California law must be filed within 1 year of the discriminatory
act. Retaliation (whistleblower) claims not connected to
discrimination must be filed within 2 years of the retaliatory
action. Defamation cases must be filed within 1 year. Other claims
have other time limits.
Conclusion: Any reliable evaluation of your potential case requires
more than this short summary can provide. A further office or
telephone conference often yields information that identifies other
potential claims. Call this office to set an appointment. I am
available to conduct in depth telephone conferences for those
prospective clients living outside Orange County. I am available to
litigate cases throughout California, and I will travel as needed
to make court appearances for cases of merit.
Recent Testimonials